Astronomical Observing Conditions
Cloud cover, sky transparency, seeing, dew point, and moon phase make up the specific combination of conditions an imaging session actually depends on.
Project / EDS
EDS is MDNT's sensing-to-alerting pipeline for environmental conditions: it ingests environmental telemetry, models near-term change, and turns the result into structured forecasts, alerts, and operational awareness for the teams that need to act on them.
System Architecture
EDS combines changing environmental inputs with near-term modeling, threshold evaluation, and outputs that can notify an operator or inform external field controllers.
Conceptual architecture / Current prototype modelSystem Overview
EDS started as a practical problem, not an abstract one: deciding whether a night is actually worth setting up for astrophotography, and keeping optics clear of dew once a session is running. That recurring, concrete decision depends on cloud cover, sky transparency, seeing, and dew point, all changing hour to hour. Those conditions shaped the system's core sense-forecast-alert loop well before it was generalized into a broader environmental decision-support pipeline.
EDS is built as a layered pipeline rather than a single monolithic tool. Sensing sources feed a normalization and modeling layer, which produces forecasts and evaluates them against configurable thresholds, which in turn drives alerting and awareness outputs. Each layer evolves independently. New sensing sources, refined models, and additional output channels can be added without reworking the system end to end.
The goal is continuous, structured visibility into changing environmental conditions, not a one-off report or a static map. EDS is designed for teams that need to track conditions over time and respond when they change. That includes environmental monitoring groups, infrastructure operators, and field research teams. It is not limited to a single fixed use case. EDS is currently an active prototype: core ingestion and modeling are running against real test data, and the surrounding system is still being shaped around that foundation.
Sensing Inputs
EDS treats sensing as a plural, extensible layer rather than a dependency on any single feed. Sources are normalized into a common schema so the modeling layer can reason over them consistently, regardless of where a given signal originates.
Cloud cover, sky transparency, seeing, dew point, and moon phase make up the specific combination of conditions an imaging session actually depends on.
Wind, precipitation, temperature, humidity, and pressure readings from ground stations and public weather feeds.
River, reservoir, and coastal water-level sensors used to track hydrological change over time.
Satellite and aerial imagery layers used to contextualize and cross-check ground-level sensor readings.
Distributed, IoT-class sensor nodes reporting localized environmental conditions from fixed or mobile deployments.
Long-run historical datasets used to establish baselines, seasonal patterns, and anomaly thresholds.
Public and institutional environmental datasets integrated as supplementary context around primary sensing sources.
Forecasting & Decision Engine
EDS combines local telemetry, retained history, and station health to estimate 1-hour and 3-hour advisory risk across astronomy, rain, dew / fog, and storm conditions. Data quality, thresholds, confidence, and physics-aware safeguards remain visible before the system exposes a reviewable state.
| Domain | 1 h | 3 h |
|---|---|---|
| Astronomy | Outlook | Outlook |
| Rain | Outlook | Outlook |
| Dew / fog | Outlook | Outlook |
| Storm | Outlook | Outlook |
Operational Awareness Outputs
The output layer is designed around how conditions actually get used day to day: quick situational read, spatial context, timely notification, and a record to look back on.
Condensed, human-readable summaries of current and forecasted environmental state.
Map-based views that place sensor data, forecasts, and alerts in spatial context.
Configurable notification channels for qualifying conditions and threshold breaches.
Time-series views for tracking how conditions evolve against baseline patterns.
Structured exports for downstream analysis, recordkeeping, or integration with other systems.
External control builds can consume EDS observing telemetry and turn it into device-local regulation and physical action.
Reference build / Automatic Optical Dew ControlPrototype Status
EDS is under active development. The system is being built layer by layer, with each stage validated against real test data before the next is added. It is not being shipped as a single fixed release.
Core ingestion and normalization for initial sensing sources is in place and running against live test data.
Baseline statistical forecasting is operational; machine-learning model refinement is ongoing.
Threshold-based alert generation exists; delivery channels are being expanded and hardened.
A dedicated EDS Console now runs current conditions, history, and advisory reasoning as structured, reviewable views, not a fixed dashboard product.
A pilot station is field-deployed and has been tested across real seasonal events; expanding to additional sites is the next milestone.
Note EDS now has its own dedicated site with interface captures, system detail, and field studies — explore.eds.mdnt.pt .
Field Study / 01
The Espinho EDS station preserved 111 / 111 complete one-minute event-window observations on 12 August 2026. A separate CosmoNutz optical record was captured in the Vila Praia de Âncora area. The public archive keeps the two locations, clocks, and evidence types distinct, then aligns them on one working Replay timeline.
Ambient light reached 11 lux at 19:32:22 WEST, eight seconds after Espinho predicted maximum. The record supports high-confidence eclipse detection through ambient light. Secondary temperature, humidity, pressure, and dew-point effects were not uniquely attributed; this was one event, at one station, during one sunset.
Field Note / 02
The published Winter Storm Field Note examines the Espinho station record from 20 January through 10 March 2026. It preserves five approved local pressure windows, applies one frozen comparison method, and keeps supported, below-threshold, and negative evidence visible.
Three official sequences met the study's 10 hPa / six-hour screening contract. Ingrid remained below that threshold, while the March period showed no major local pressure signature. This is an observational record only: it does not establish historical forecast skill, warning lead time, national storm severity, or a forecasting threshold.
Collaboration
MDNT is open to focused collaboration on EDS: sensing integrations, forecasting model design, environmental data partnerships, and structured field pilots. If your work touches environmental monitoring, infrastructure operations, or applied environmental research, get in touch.
20F4 1435 3E7E A1A6 7EC0
EA11 8DFF F119 FF5B 8464
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- xjMEalDKCRYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAgNOFm8pBHMT/aRdKjxiGKat9yaTZQV0B jtic3+tSzvzNG2xhYnNAbWRudC5wdCA8bGFic0BtZG50LnB0PsLAEQQTFgoA gwWCalDKCQMLCQcJEI3/8Rn/W4RkRRQAAAAAABwAIHNhbHRAbm90YXRpb25z Lm9wZW5wZ3Bqcy5vcmckEPEU0W1M01ix+48GvMHDz07lTXtJZ2ZP7vr8QTU/ 9QMVCggEFgACAQIZAQKbAwIeARYhBCD0FDU+fqGmfsDqEY3/8Rn/W4RkAAAN lwD/Qq5jmcu9TiEyNexgqRAb4hWSEHxBJIdEkMWIxeeRuYkA/0yZzdoxKuUl OrvWQr6YaJZkxlh/dzc6d1L6mLvnH5wBzjgEalDKCRIKKwYBBAGXVQEFAQEH QLvXLPszOZ6egFG8N3wRJ6h5blm164WpNfTJviOrYEp4AwEIB8K+BBgWCgBw BYJqUMoJCRCN//EZ/1uEZEUUAAAAAAAcACBzYWx0QG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVu cGdwanMub3JnMH+xpvowDplsJoB2TZeF2V4tKCmgfj4RX5635Q1nVwwCmwwW IQQg9BQ1Pn6hpn7A6hGN//EZ/1uEZAAAEzIBANhXi4zG/UyEFcvhWE8EAnFI nKIiXzVeCGype1l2/12tAP9Cyekpb4NStGIPCUfPZ87v7YMWCssDXkQaxv74 sqpyCQ== =zuPU -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----